English,Spanish,Chinese,Persian,Arabic,French,Russian,Korean,Japanese.
.
Because the UN is powerless, WARS and massacres will never end. They just repeat idealistic theories like talking to themselves, without offering any concrete solutions, so I, a professional inventor, propose a set of world rules. All readers, please send this to the UN officials. *The UN rules are only (2) to (12), and (1) is a war eradication measure that can be implemented by individuals. Yes, you can stop war with your own hands.
| 2+10 ideas to end war forever | ||||||||||||
| 1 | （1） Market Collapse Upon War Preparation. As movements of fighter jets and aircraft carriers are now trackable via websites, we can notify global investors with brokerage accounts the moment a country begins preparing for war. Since currencies, government bonds, and stocks would plummet just by the mere sign of preparation, this creates a powerful deterrent effect. * Leadership (Private Sector): Appealing to governments through the UN is often futile. Efforts should instead be directed toward major securities firms. * Leadership (Individuals): If individuals create “War Preparation Watch” websites and build an email subscriber list, even a single person can implement a practical measure to prevent war. |
|||||||||||
| 2 | (2) Automatic Regime Change Upon Declaration of War. Establish an international rule where any ruling party that initiates a war is forcibly removed from power. The government would be handed over to the opposition, and the warmongering party’s seats would be reduced to a level below that of the opposition. Leadership (UN): Once this rule is ratified at a UN conference, the effect would be permanent. It requires no ongoing labor or maintenance after implementation. |
|||||||||||
| 3 | (3-A) Placing the Aggressor’s Central Bank Under UN Control. If the United Nations seizes control of the Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) system—the core of a central bank’s operations—the country will be unable to issue currency or even transfer funds. This would make it impossible to procure not only war funds but also general national expenses, effectively and reliably halting the war.. Leadership (UN): If implemented by the third day of a conflict, the intent to fight would be clear to the world, justifying the intervention. (3-B) Transferring the Forfeited Central Bank to the Victimized Nation. Establish a rule where, in the event of an attack or massacre against a nation without a standing military (such as Palestine or Lebanon), the UN seizes the aggressor’s central bank and transfers its ownership to the victimized nation. Since losing a central bank is synonymous with the collapse of the state, this would serve as an absolute deterrent against initiating war. *Feasibility: While this method is certain to be effective, it requires United Nations leadership. Therefore, method (1) (Market Collapse) is easier to implement. *Universal Application:This measure should apply not only to international wars but also to state-sponsored massacres of a country’s own citizens. If the UN can take control of central banks under these conditions, we can eliminate war and genocide from the world. |
|||||||||||
| 4 | (4) Cutting Off GPS Communications for the Aggressor State. By disabling GPS access, nearly all modern weaponry becomes neutralized. Since the military would be forced to rely on visual bombing, their defeat would be inevitable. * Related Measures: Similarly, the UN could block government and military internet domains (such as .gov) and disrupt the Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) systems. Leadership: UN. |
|||||||||||
| 5 | (5) SWIFT (CIPS) Ban. Immediately prohibit all international fund transfers for any nation that initiates a war. * Related Measur: Similarly, the world would impose a total trade embargo on the aggressor state and sever its internet connectivity from the global network. Leadership: UN. |
|||||||||||
| 6 | (6) Freezing Foreign Exchange Reserves. Freeze the foreign exchange reserves of the aggressor nation. These assets will not be returned even after the war ends; instead, they will be allocated as reparations to the victimized nation. Leadership: UN. |
|||||||||||
| 7 | (7) Economic Sanctions and Asset Freezing of Key Leaders. Impose economic sanctions on the head of state of the aggressor nation, any members of parliament who voted in favor of the war, ( and their immediate families). The frozen assets will not be returned but will be allocated as compensation to the victimized nation after the conflict ends. Leadership: UN. |
|||||||||||
| 8 | (8) Prosecution of Responsible Individuals. International judicial and police authorities will issue arrest warrants for the head of state of the aggressor nation (as well as the members of parliament who voted for the war) to stand trial at an international court. A worn-out, ineffective solution. Leadership: UN.. |
|||||||||||
| 9 | (9) A Revolutionary Shift: Individual Accountability & Guaranteed Asylum. A Groundbreaking Evolution in International Law: In a radical departure from traditional military protocols, this plan establishes a new global standard where individual soldiers are held directly accountable for violations of international law. No longer can “following orders” be used as a shield. The Right to Refuse & Protected Defection: Critically, this policy grants every soldier the legal right to refuse illegal combat orders. To facilitate this, the UN will provide a robust shelter to protect those who choose “Asylum with Guaranteed Immunity.” Leadership: UN.. |
|||||||||||
| 10 | (10) Joint Liability for the Defense Industry. Arms dealers also bear collective responsibility: This revolutionary rule introduces joint liability for arms manufacturers. If weapons are used against civilians, the producing company will be legally mandated to pay reparations equal to the amount owed by the aggressor nation. The Strategic Outcome: The implementation of this policy would create a massive financial risk for the private sector. Consequently, defense contractors would likely cease all supplies to militaries involved in controversial conflicts, such as the current situations involving the Israeli or U.S. militaries, effectively starving the war machine of its resources. Leadership: UN.. |
|||||||||||
| 11 | (11) Neutralizing Weaponry via Electronic Warfare. Deploy localized HPM (High-Power Microwave) attacks—a targeted version of EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse)—against the military bases of the aggressor nation. By inducing electrical failures in all modern equipment, the weaponry is rendered useless without the need for traditional bombardment. The Outcome: Since the military loses the technical capacity to launch or sustain an attack, the war is effectively and completely brought to a halt. Leadership: UN.. |
|||||||||||
| 12 | (12) Dismantling the United States and Israel. Statistical analysis shows that over 90%—and in recent years, nearly 99%—of all wars over the past 80 years have involved these two nations. Therefore, the dissolution of the United States and Israel is viewed as the ultimate prerequisite for global peace. The Outcome: By removing these two primary drivers of conflict from the geopolitical map, the root cause of global warfare would be eliminated, ensuring that no further wars occur in the future. |
|||||||||||
(1) When a country begins preparing for war, its markets collapse.
Private companies take the lead. If major securities firms cooperate, “telling the world” is easy. The UN should have appealed to private companies instead of trying to persuade governments, which is ineffective. Investors dislike war because it reduces their assets, and this is information that everyone, without exception, wants. The need is enormous.
(1) Individuals take the lead.
If securities firms are slow to act, individuals could create a “war preparation monitoring site” and have people register their email addresses; a considerable number of readers would register. Individuals could stop war without relying on the UN or corporations.
* (2) through (12) are also my ideas, but the role of leading them needs to be entrusted to the United Nations, so (1) has a higher chance of being implemented.
wwbb > Antenna Blog NBB
The abilities that AI struggles with the most are “originality, ideas, and invention.”
The secret to amateurs achieving results that surpass professionals—like Leonardo da Vinci—is “doing things differently.”
▼Political Solution Invention
└”2+10 ideas to eradicate war in human history” in 2026
└”The punching ballot election sys.” eradicated fraud and its costs to 0.6%.
└”The 99% Party” An invention that can get politics worldwide. in2021
└”‘nbbGOLD Coin” An invention that can get global finance. in2022
└”Preventive Measures Against AI-Induced Job Difficulties” in2023
└””Superhuman Training University” in 2024
└Inventing a New Political Sys.”99%-cracy (Popular Gov’t)” in 2025
└Inventing a new currency system: “Dual Currency” in 2025
└The most ideal country, ” IDEAL ia ” in 2025
└The greatest base currency in history “Ark Gold” in 2025
└In 2006, ‘WWBB‘ ranked 8 billion people by ability / From 2023 onwards, AI scoring makes it a realistic possibility.
.
English,Spanish,Chinese,Persian,Arabic,French,Russian,Korean,Japanese.
The UN is powerless. UNSG’s idealistic pronouncements are just empty words. Wars continue because there are no concrete solutions. Here’s my suggestion.
— NBB_NeverBornBusinessman (@NeverBornBizman) April 30, 2026
” 12 ideas to end war forever “https://t.co/lGU6JpXv8K
@UN,@antonioguterres,@FranceskAlbs,@UNPeacekeeping,@UNGeneva.